← Chapter 1 Compact Review | Chapter 2 Map | Chapter 3 Compact Review →
Chapter 2: LTI System Properties & Time-Domain Convolution - Compact Review
This compact review card synthesizes all core concepts, mathematical definitions, final-line derivations, and architectural realization structures for continuous-time and discrete-time systems under Chapter 2: LTI System Properties & Time-Domain Convolution.
1. Systems Classification & Mathematical Operators
1.1 Linearity: Superposition & Homogeneity
*(Target: Theory Descriptive / Linearity Verification)*
- Concept: A system is linear if and only if it simultaneously satisfies the principles of additivity (superposition) and homogeneity (scaling). A linear system has the property that a zero input strictly produces a zero output.
- Governing Equations:
- Additivity:
- Homogeneity:
- Unified Linearity Condition:
1.2 Time-Invariance (Shift-Invariance)
*(Target: Theory Descriptive / Time-Invariance Verification)*
- Concept: A system is time-invariant if its internal parameters do not change over time. A time shift applied to the input signal must produce an identical time shift in the output response.
- Governing Formula:
- The Two-Step Verification Checklist:
- Step 1: Delay the system output by directly: .
- Step 2: Pass a delayed input through the operator: .
- Check: If , the system is Time-Invariant. If they are not equal, the system is Time-Variant.
1.3 Causality
*(Target: Theory Descriptive / Causality Boundary Check)*
- Concept: A system is causal if its output at any instant depends strictly on current and past input values, but is completely independent of future input values. A continuous-time LTI system described by a differential equation is causal when it is initially relaxed {if input for , then output for }.
- s-Domain/z-Domain Causal Boundary: The impulse response must satisfy:
1.4 Memory (Dynamic) vs. Memoryless (Static)
*(Target: Theory Descriptive / Memoryless Bound)*
- Concept: A system is memoryless (static) if its output at any instant depends strictly on the input applied at that exact instant . If the output depends on inputs at other times (past or future), the system has memory (dynamic).
- Memoryless LTI Bound: An LTI system is memoryless if and only if its impulse response is a scaled Dirac delta function:
1.5 Bounded-Input Bounded-Output (BIBO) Stability
*(Target: Theory Descriptive / Stability Test)*
- Concept: A system is BIBO stable if every bounded input sequence produces a bounded output response.
- Input-Output Bounded Limits:
2. Continuous-Time Convolution Integral
2.1 The Representation of Signals in Terms of Impulses
*(Target: Mathematical Proof / 5-Mark derivation)*
- Concept: Any arbitrary continuous-time signal can be represented as a weighted superposition of infinite, shifted continuous impulse functions.
- Governing Formula:
2.2 The Continuous Convolution Integral
*(Target: Numerical Solving / System Response)*
- Concept: The continuous-time convolution operates on an input and system impulse response to calculate the exact time-domain system response .
- Governing Formula:
2.3 Mathematical Properties of Continuous Convolution
*(Target: Theory Descriptive & Proofs)*
- Commutative Property:
- Distributive Property:
- Associative Property:
- Convolution with a Unit Impulse:
- Convolution with Shifted / Delayed Inputs:
- Convolution Time-Scaling Identity:
ight] \quad ext{for } a eq 0y(2t) = 2 \left[ x(2t) * h(2t) ight] \quad ext{(derivation)}$$
- Differentiation Property of Convolution: rac{dy(t)}{dt} = rac{dx(t)}{dt} * h(t) = x(t) * rac{dh(t)}{dt} \quad ext{(derivation)}
3. Discrete-Time Convolution Sum
3.1 The Discrete Convolution Sum
*(Target: Numerical Solving / Sequence Inversion)*
- Concept: The discrete counterpart of the convolution integral, evaluating the output sequence by summing the weighted and shifted impulse response sequences triggered by each input sample.
- Governing Formula:
3.2 Sequence Length Theorem
*(Target: Numerical Solving)*
- Concept: Convolving two finite-duration sequences of lengths and yields a resulting convolved sequence of a larger finite duration.
- Governing Formula:
3.3 Periodic (Circular) vs. Linear Convolution
*(Target: Theory Descriptive / 5-Mark comparison)*
- Concept: Linear convolution operates on infinite or finite aperiodic sequences. If signals and are periodic with common period , linear convolution does not converge. Periodic convolution integrates/sums only over a single period (or samples), forcing the output response to be strictly periodic.
- Continuous Periodic Convolution:
- Discrete Periodic Convolution:
angle_N]$$
4. Continuous & Discrete BIBO Stability Proofs
4.1 Continuous-Time Absolute Integrability Proof
*(Target: Mathematical Proof / 8-Mark Derivation)*
- Premise: A continuous-time LTI system is BIBO stable if and only if its impulse response is absolutely integrable.
- Governing Formula:
4.2 Discrete-Time Absolute Summability Proof
*(Target: Mathematical Proof / 5-Mark Derivation)*
- Premise: A discrete-time LTI system is BIBO stable if and only if its impulse response sequence is absolutely summable.
- Governing Formula:
5. Systems Described by Differential & Difference Equations
5.1 Linear Constant-Coefficient Differential Equations (LCCDE)
*(Target: Numerical Solving / Continuous-Time System)*
- Concept: Represents a continuous-time system where the relationship between the output and input is governed by a linear combination of derivatives.
- Governing Equation: \sum_{n=0}^{N} a_n rac{d^n y(t)}{dt^n} = \sum_{m=0}^{M} b_m rac{d^m x(t)}{dt^m}
5.2 Linear Constant-Coefficient Difference Equations
*(Target: Numerical Solving / Discrete-Time System)*
- Concept: Governs discrete-time LTI recursive (IIR) or non-recursive (FIR) systems.
- Governing Equation:
5.3 Complete Response Decompositions
*(Target: Theory Descriptive)*
- The Output Splitting Law:
- The Complementary (Homogeneous) Solution: Evaluated by setting the input terms to zero ( or ).
- The Particular Solution: Represents the system’s steady-state output corresponding to the specific profile of the input signal.
5.4 Characteristic Roots & Homogeneous Solution Forms
*(Target: Numerical Solving / Algebraic Rules)*
- Distinct Roots (): y_c[n] = lpha_1 \lambda_1^n + lpha_2 \lambda_2^n + \dots + lpha_N \lambda_N^n
- Repeated Roots (Root of multiplicity ):
ight) \lambda_1^n + eta_2 \lambda_2^n + \dots$$
- Complex Conjugate Roots ():
ight) \quad ext{where } r = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}, ; heta = an^{-1}\left(rac{b}{a} ight)$$
6. Block Diagram Realizations & Interconnections
6.1 Direct Form Realizations
*(Target: Block Diagram Realization / 5-to-8 Mark Draw)*
- Direct Form I Realization: Separately realizes input zeros (feedforward delays) and output poles (feedback delays). It is non-canonic because it uses a separate set of delay/integrator elements for both parts.
- Direct Form II Realization: Merges the delay paths for both input and output sections into a single, unified delay/integrator chain. It is canonic because it minimizes the total number of delay elements required ( delays for an -th order system).
6.2 System Interconnections
*(Target: Theory Descriptive / Cascade vs. Parallel)*
Cascade (Series Connection): Parallel Connection:
┌───────┐
┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌─>│ h₁(t) ├──┐
x(t)─│ h₁(t) ├───>│ h₂(t) ─>y(t) │ └───────┘ v ┌───┐
└────────┘ └────────┘ x(t)┤ ├──>│ + ├──> y(t)
│ ┌───────┐ ^ └───┘
└─>│ h₂(t) ├──┘
└───────┘
- Cascade (Series) Connection: The overall impulse response is the convolution of individual subsystem responses:
- Parallel Connection: The overall impulse response is the direct algebraic sum of subsystem responses:
6.3 Inverse Systems & Deconvolution
*(Target: Theory Descriptive)*
- Concept: A system is invertible if its input can be completely recovered from its output response using an inverse system .
- Governing Formula:
7. Master Comparison Tables
Table 2.1: System Properties Test Matrix
*(Pre-Exam Quick Lookup)*
| Property | Continuous Condition | Discrete Condition | Practical Checklist |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linearity | Zero input must produce zero output. No nonlinear terms (squares, logs, sines of signals). | ||
| Time-Invariance | Check independent variable coefficient. If scaled (e.g., , ), it is Time-Variant. | ||
| Causality | Output at must not depend on inputs at (e.g., , are noncausal). | ||
| Memory | $h(t) | ||
| eq c\delta(t)$ | $h[n] | ||
| eq c\delta[n]$ | If output depends only on the present input, it is memoryless; else, it is dynamic. | ||
| BIBO Stability | $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \lvert h(t) | ||
| vert dt < \infty$ | $\sum_{-\infty}^{\infty} \lvert h[n] | ||
| vert < \infty$ | Every bounded input must produce a bounded output (e.g., integrations, step responses are unstable). |
Table 2.2: Continuous vs. Discrete Convolution Properties
*(Symmetry and Sizing Mapping)*
| Parameter | Continuous-Time Convolution | Discrete-Time Convolution |
|---|---|---|
| Governing Operator | Integral: | Infinite Summation: |
| Aperiodic Sequence Bounds | Evaluated via piecewise continuous limits. | Sequence Length Theorem: . |
| Unit Impulse Response | ||
| Integrability/Summability | Area: | Sum: $\sum y[n] = \left( \sum x[n] |
| ight) \cdot \left( \sum h[n] | ||
| ight)$ |
Table 2.3: Recursive (IIR) vs. Non-Recursive (FIR) Difference Equations
*(Structural Properties)*
| Attribute | Non-Recursive (FIR) Systems | Recursive (IIR) Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback Paths | None. No output feedback loop is present. | Present. Output terms are fed back. |
| Impulse Response Duration | Finite Duration (Finite Impulse Response). | Infinite Duration (Infinite Impulse Response). |
| Stability | Always stable (since is finite and bounded). | Conditionally stable (depends on pole locations inside the unit circle). |
| Memory Elements | Fixed memory storage proportional to order . | Requires infinite decay tracking of feedback states. |
8. Verbatim Chapter 2 PYQ Bank
2025/2022 Exam Section B Q. 1
If , then show that: Answer Plan: Use variable substitutions inside the convolution integral of with , scaling both dummy variable and actual time .
2023/2017/2015 Exam Section B
Show that the output response of an LTI system is the convolution sum of the input signal and the impulse response of the system. Answer Plan: Represent the arbitrary input signal as a weighted summation of discrete impulses: . Apply the system operator , utilizing Linearity (superposition) to move the operator inside the sum, and Time-Invariance () to yield the convolution sum.
2024 Exam Section B Q. 2
Draw the block diagram of the system described by: rac{d^2 y(t)}{dt^2} + 3y(t) = rac{dx(t)}{dt} + 2rac{d^2 x(t)}{dt^2} \quad ext{(05 Marks)} Answer Plan: Integrate the second-order equation twice to avoid differentiators, isolate , and construct the Direct Form II canonic block diagram utilizing two integrators, multipliers, and adders.
2021 Exam Section B Q. 3
Derive the expression of convolution with delayed input and delayed impulse response. Answer Plan: Starting from , substitute delayed variables and into the integral, use variable substitution , and match the resulting expression directly to .
9. Common Mistakes That Cost Marks
Critical Exam Pitfalls
- Direct Form II Feedback Coefficient Sign Swap: When sketching Direct Form II diagrams, failing to negate the feedback coefficients. Remember: feedback terms in difference/differential equations must be subtracted on summing junctions to represent negative feedback multipliers.
- Evaluating Causal Overlap Boundaries incorrectly: Performing graphical convolution of piecewise signals without checking overlap boundaries. Always verify the active integration interval for each segment of time before computing areas.
- Discrete Origin () Arrow Omission: When evaluating discrete tabular convolution, failing to locate and mark the index in convolved sequences.
- Applying Value Theorems to Unstable LTI Systems: Evaluating the Final Value Theorem on unstable systems with poles outside or on the imaginary axis.
10. Pre-Exam Self-Check Checklist
- Can you verify linearity and time-invariance for any continuous-time system equations?
- Can you prove that a continuous LTI system is BIBO stable if and only if ?
- Can you calculate the length of convolved finite discrete arrays?
- Can you draw canonic Direct Form II representations of second-order continuous differential and discrete difference equations?